• Member Login
  • Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
    0Shopping Cart
Oregon Seed Association
  • About Us
    • Members
    • Why Become a Member?
    • Officers & Board of Directors
    • Bylaws
    • Code of Ethics
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Mid-Winter Meeting
    • Summer Convention
    • Cool Season Grass Workshop
  • Resources
    • OSA Seed Labeling Database
    • Seed Testing Labs
    • OSA Seed Lab Update
    • News
    • Legislative Reports
    • Palmer Amaranth
    • Industry Links
    • Commonly Used Acronyms
    • Stewardship Policy
  • Sponsors
  • Scholarship
    • Scholarship Award Recipients
  • Contact
  • Careers
    • Job Posts
    • Create a Job Post
    • Resume Posts
    • Create a Resume Post
  • Menu Menu
You are here: Home1 / Puzzling Truths In Labeling

Puzzling Truths In Labeling

January 23, 2015

Sharon Davidson, 
registered seed technologist and president of Agri Seed Testing, Inc.

The issue of seed testing uniformity is a complex and convoluted problem with many players and facets involved. There’s thousands of seed species, nearly a hundred labs, multiple testing methods, governance and compliance.

After having been in the seed testing industry for 34 years, I’ve seen just about everything. While I applaud the Association of Official Seed Analysts, the Society of Commercial Seed Technologists and the American Seed Trade Association for under-taking this issue, I caution that it’s not just about the diversity of seed species and testing methods.

From my perspective, the bigger issue is whose “truth” does a labeler use? But in reality, it doesn’t matter if a labeler chooses to use test results from Lab A versus Lab C because it’s the regulatory lab’s test results that are the “truth.” Right or wrong, perhaps more examples of wrong than right, the regulatory lab has the last say, and the company that printed the label either has to over label with that “truth” or remove the seed for sale, in addition to paying a fine.

“The bigger issue is whose ‘truth’ does a labeler use?”
— Sharon DavidsonTesting Within Tolerance

Testing Within Tolerance

A recent example is a label developed from a blend sheet. Regulatory picked up a box to test and found that the percent annual ryegrass was out of tolerance, which led to the issuance of a stop sale. This same sample was sent to the federal laboratory in North Carolina and a private lab only to find that the federal laboratory, the private laboratory and the seed tag were well within tolerance. It was the regulatory lab that was out of tolerance.

When questioned, the regulatory lab reported that it followed the method in the AOSA Rules for Testing Seeds handbook, however the technician only tested 200 seeds instead of 400. This leads me to wonder what other short cuts are taken? Is there a dark room for fluorescence testing? How old is the blue black light used? Is the media Whatmans No. 1 filter paper? But all of these questions are irrelevant because the regulatory lab is always right.

Again, whose “truth” should be used for labeling because by the time all this was discovered, the seed was mislabeled to meet the stop sale demand and sold out.

The concept of achieving uniformity among seed testing laboratories is admirable but I believe a critical piece of the puzzle all comes back to dollars — funding for state mandated regulatory labs. In my conversations with folks from state mandated regulatory labs, I hear “we can’t do that; we don’t have funding, space or personnel.” While they might not have the funding, space or personnel, their reports are used to issue a stop sale. And that is a lot of money and in some cases results in the loss of a sales window.

I agree that there needs to be some kind of a “fix” to the whole system. There needs to be a way to remove regulatory authority from labs that are constantly out of tolerance. There needs to be a mechanism by which all labs are held accountable for their laboratory results. Besides those labs accredited by the International Seed Testing Association, there is currently not a mechanism in place. There needs to be a way to tease out the true quality of a lot when a discrepancy occurs instead of stop sale, re-label and fining a company.

What about sampling? Several organizations have sampling protocols, all of which include a trier that reaches at least the middle of the container, yet time and again, photographic proof that 6-inch thief triers are still being used. A test result is only as good as the sample provided.

What about the companies that purposefully shop tests? They know which labs do not find noxious weeds, always get higher purities and the highest germination. There are “go to” labs when the risk of a fine is less than the profit margin they stand to gain. Buy on one lab test, sell on another test is common practice in commerce.

There are a lot of pieces to this multi-dimensional puzzle, and uniformity is just one piece of one dimension.

Read the original article on Seed World here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share by Mail
https://oregonseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/osa-logo.png 0 0 Admin https://oregonseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/osa-logo.png Admin2015-01-23 10:48:102015-01-23 10:48:10Puzzling Truths In Labeling

Archive

  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (1)
  • July 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (2)
  • April 2024 (1)
  • March 2024 (1)
  • February 2024 (1)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (3)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (4)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (6)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • October 2014 (5)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (4)
  • January 2014 (7)
  • December 2013 (5)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (5)
  • August 2013 (8)
  • July 2013 (5)
  • June 2013 (10)
  • May 2013 (7)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (2)
  • March 2012 (1)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (1)

New Members

  • Application
  • Bylaws
  • Antitrust Statement
  • Why Become a Member?

Contact

[email protected]
PO Box 262
Tangent, OR 97389

© Copyright - Oregon Seed Association | Privacy Policy
Link to: Governor to propose Oregon GMO bill Link to: Governor to propose Oregon GMO bill Governor to propose Oregon GMO bill Link to: Coexistence possible for all crops Link to: Coexistence possible for all crops Coexistence possible for all crops
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top