• Member Login
  • Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
    0Shopping Cart
Oregon Seed Association
  • About Us
    • Members
    • Why Become a Member?
    • Officers & Board of Directors
    • Bylaws
    • Code of Ethics
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Mid-Winter Meeting
    • Summer Convention
    • Cool Season Grass Workshop
  • Resources
    • OSA Seed Labeling Database
    • Seed Testing Labs
    • OSA Seed Lab Update
    • News
    • Legislative Reports
    • Palmer Amaranth
    • Industry Links
    • Commonly Used Acronyms
    • Stewardship Policy
  • Sponsors
  • Scholarship
    • Scholarship Award Recipients
  • Contact
  • Careers
    • Job Posts
    • Create a Job Post
    • Resume Posts
    • Create a Resume Post
  • Menu Menu
You are here: Home1 / Parliament rejects national GMO bans proposal

Parliament rejects national GMO bans proposal

October 30, 2015

 Press release – Environment / Public health / Food safety − 28-10-2015 – 14:27

osa web

No realistic way for EU countries to keep EU-approved GMO food and feed out of their national markets, say MEPs. © AP Images/European Union – EP

A draft EU law that would enable any EU member state to restrict or prohibit the sale and use of EU-approved GMO food or feed on its territory was rejected by the European Parliament on Wednesday. Members are concerned that the law might prove unworkable or that it could lead to the reintroduction of border checks between pro- and anti-GMO countries. They call on the Commission to table a new proposal.

“Today’s vote gave a clear signal to the European Commission. This proposal could turn on its head what has been achieved with the single market and the customs union”, said rapporteur Giovanni La Via (EPP, IT), whose recommendation to reject the proposal was approved by 577 votes to 75, with 38 abstentions.

“Over the last few months, serious concerns have been expressed about the lack of any impact assessment, the proposal’s compatibility with the single market, and also whether it is actually feasible. There was no evaluation of the potential consequences or of other available options”, he added.

“I believe that this proposal could have negative consequences for agriculture in the EU, which is heavily dependent on protein supplies from GMO sources. It could also have indirect negative effects on imports. Finally, there are concerns over whether this proposal could even be implemented, because there are no border controls in the EU”, he concluded.

The proposal, which would amend existing EU legislation to enable member states to restrict or prohibit the use of EU-approved genetically modified food and feed on their territory, was tabled by the EU Commission on 22 April 2015.

The Commission suggested that this proposal should be modelled on another EU law, on GMOs intended for cultivation, which entered into force in early April 2015. This allows member states to ban the cultivation of EU-approved GMOs on their territory.

But whereas cultivation necessarily takes place on a member state’s territory, GMO trade crosses borders, which means that a national “sales and use” ban could be difficult or impossible to enforce without reintroducing border checks on imports.

Next steps

European Commissioner for Health and Food safety Vytenis Andriukaitis has said that the European Commission will not withdraw the legislative proposal, which will be discussed by EU ministers.

Read the original article from the Capital Press here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share by Mail
https://oregonseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/osa-logo.png 0 0 https://oregonseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/osa-logo.png 2015-10-30 09:30:232015-10-30 10:12:03Parliament rejects national GMO bans proposal

Archive

  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (1)
  • July 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (2)
  • April 2024 (1)
  • March 2024 (1)
  • February 2024 (1)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (3)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (4)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (6)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • October 2014 (5)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (4)
  • January 2014 (7)
  • December 2013 (5)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (5)
  • August 2013 (8)
  • July 2013 (5)
  • June 2013 (10)
  • May 2013 (7)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (2)
  • March 2012 (1)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (1)

New Members

  • Application
  • Bylaws
  • Antitrust Statement
  • Why Become a Member?

Contact

[email protected]
PO Box 262
Tangent, OR 97389

© Copyright - Oregon Seed Association | Privacy Policy
Link to: A Message from Representative Kurt Schrader Link to: A Message from Representative Kurt Schrader A Message from Representative Kurt Schrader Link to: What do Sports Field Managers Demand from Turfgrass Today? Link to: What do Sports Field Managers Demand from Turfgrass Today? What do Sports Field Managers Demand from Turfgrass Today?
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top