• Member Login
  • Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
    0Shopping Cart
Oregon Seed Association
  • About Us
    • Members
    • Why Become a Member?
    • Officers & Board of Directors
    • Bylaws
    • Code of Ethics
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Mid-Winter Meeting
    • Summer Convention
    • Cool Season Grass Workshop
  • Resources
    • OSA Seed Labeling Database
    • Seed Testing Labs
    • OSA Seed Lab Update
    • News
    • Legislative Reports
    • Palmer Amaranth
    • Industry Links
    • Commonly Used Acronyms
    • Stewardship Policy
  • Sponsors
  • Scholarship
    • Scholarship Award Recipients
  • Contact
  • Careers
    • Job Posts
    • Create a Job Post
    • Resume Posts
    • Create a Resume Post
  • Menu Menu
You are here: Home1 / Inclusion of GMO crop policy in PERS, tax negotiations riles some Demo...

Inclusion of GMO crop policy in PERS, tax negotiations riles some Democrats

September 18, 2013

By CHRISTIAN GASTON
THE OREGONIAN —

A policy staunchly opposed by environmentalists has entered the negotiations over a package of public pension cuts and new tax increases, The Oregonian has learned.

Senate Bill 633 would have prevented local governments from regulating the propagation of genetically modified plants. It passed the Senate in May, but died in the House during the Legislative session under pressure from environmentalists and some farmers.

Now, a modification of that policy is back on the table. In discussions Tuesday on a budget package aimed at boosting funding for schools and public services, legislative leadership included a new version of the policy from SB 633 as a bargaining chip.

What left the plan, which was shown to lawmakers earlier this week, is a reduction in money match benefits for people who left state employment without retiring.

Cutting benefits on so-called “inactive” members of the Public Employees Retirement System is considered legally risky by some lawyers, who think the Oregon Supreme Court is more likely to strike down a policy reducing money match benefits for a certain class of retirees.

Removing the money match portion of the PERS cuts would reduce the long-term savings envisioned by the package from $5 billion to $4.6 billion.

In brokering the deal, Democrats allowed a modified version of SB 633 to be included in the increasingly complex package of legislation.

Under terms of the latest deal shown to rank-and-file lawmakers last night, the rules barring local governments from passing limits on genetically modified crops would exempt Jackson County, where voters will weigh in on a ballot measure banning the crops next year.

Some Democrats are privately scoffing at the new package, which also includes tax cuts for some businesses and new tax revenue that together would raise roughly $200 million in new revenue over the next two years.

Republicans are also unhappy with the reduced PERS savings.

It’s unclear what the deal’s fate will be in the coming days. Lawmakers are in Salem for routine meetings but aren’t in session. But Gov. John Kitzhaber has taken the opportunity of having lawmakers in town to try to broker a deal between the parties on new PERS cuts and increased taxes.

Kitzhaber has said he would call the Legislature into a special session Sept. 30 if lawmakers can reach an agreement.

Click here to read the original article from The Oregonian.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share by Mail
https://oregonseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/osa-logo.png 0 0 Admin https://oregonseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/osa-logo.png Admin2013-09-18 11:11:282013-09-18 11:11:46Inclusion of GMO crop policy in PERS, tax negotiations riles some Democrats

Archive

  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (1)
  • July 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (2)
  • April 2024 (1)
  • March 2024 (1)
  • February 2024 (1)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (3)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (4)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (6)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • October 2014 (5)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (4)
  • January 2014 (7)
  • December 2013 (5)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (5)
  • August 2013 (8)
  • July 2013 (5)
  • June 2013 (10)
  • May 2013 (7)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (2)
  • March 2012 (1)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (1)

New Members

  • Application
  • Bylaws
  • Antitrust Statement
  • Why Become a Member?

Contact

[email protected]
PO Box 262
Tangent, OR 97389

© Copyright - Oregon Seed Association | Privacy Policy
Link to: Grass seed prices on the rise Link to: Grass seed prices on the rise Grass seed prices on the rise Link to: Pick a low-maintenance lawn grass this month Link to: Pick a low-maintenance lawn grass this month Pick a low-maintenance lawn grass this month
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top